Twisted Sister frontman Dee Snider is not so arrogant that he can’t say he’s sorry. The rock singer is proving this by offering an apology to Kelly Osbourne over some comments he made about her father, Ozzy Osbourne.

It all started when a social media user brought up bassist Bob Daisley’s claim that he had written a lot of the lyrics for Ozzy’s solo album No Rest for the Wicked. Daisley went on to claim that he was fired and told that his lyrics weren’t needed.

Visit biznow.biz for more information.

Snider then alleged that “Ozzy always had bass players write his lyrics,” even in the Black Sabbath days. The hair metal frontman claimed that Sabbath bassist Geezer Butler “wrote ALL of Black Sabbath’s lyrics.” He then noted Daisley’s songwriting allegations and implied that Motörhead vocalist Lemmy Kilmister also “wrote lyrics” for Ozzy.

Some of Ozzy’s bassists helped write songs, but it would not be accurate to say that they were “all” written by others

Kelly Osbourne caught wind of Snider’s comments and took to Instagram to defend her late father. “My father’s legacy as a musician, songwriter, singer and bandleader speaks for itself,” she wrote in a post. “His friends, those who worked with him, those who love him, and millions of fans around the world that still continue to buy his records know exactly what he meant, what he contributed and what he leaves behind. His legacy will live on eternally.”

The former reality TV star then harshly criticized Snider for his comments and compared his career to that of her father’s. Which, of course, are starkly different.

Subsequently, an X/Twitter user explained to Snider why Kelly appeared to be upset. “From what I saw on Instagram, Kelly seemed hurt because she took it as diminishing Ozzy’s legacy — not because the songwriting history itself is false,” the person offered.

“Text strips away tone,” they added. “I know you respect Ozzy. If it were me, I’d simply say: ‘I’m sorry it hurt you. That was never my intent.'”

Dee Snider listened and attempted to amend the beef with Kelly Osbourne

Snider then responded by quote-tweeting the post and extending an apology. “Thank you Steve, I’ve been looking for the right response,” he wrote. In a follow-up post, Snider spoke to Kelly directly, seeking to make amends. “I’m sorry what I said hurt you,” he wrote. “It was never my intent. My sympathies on the loss of your dad.”

At this time, Kelly does not appear to have responded to Snider’s apology.

Photo by Bobby Bank/Getty Images

The post Dee Snider Apologizes to Kelly Osbourne After She Told Him to Keep Ozzy’s Name ‘Out of Your F***ing Mouth’ appeared first on VICE.

Read full story at source

Pat McAfee is officially the face of ESPN.

Visit newsbetting.bond for more information.

On Wednesday, the network announced that McAfee will join its "Monday Night Football" pregame show this season and host his daily program live from the site of the matchup. The move also positions McAfee to serve as a main analyst on ESPN's pregame and halftime coverage of the network's first Super Bowl broadcast in February.

McAfee will continue his role on "College GameDay." In doing so, he will become the first ESPN personality to work both "GameDay" and "Monday Night Countdown," the network's two most important live shoulder programs.

Further, ESPN and McAfee are in discussions to renew his current agreement with the network for around $60 million a year, sources confirm to OutKick.

JOSH PATE WAS EVICTED WHILE EARNING $27K. NOW, HE RUNS A COLLEGE FOOTBALL MEDIA EMPIRE

For much of the past decade, Stephen A. Smith held the unofficial but consensus title of "face of ESPN," just as Chris Berman did before him. But Smith's stature inside ESPN is not what it was. He is no longer part of the network's NBA Finals coverage. "First Take's" ratings have slumped. The perception of Smith now falls somewhere between repetitive and uninformed.

Smith's waning influence inside ESPN is perhaps best demonstrated by his inability to retain his preferred co-stars. For four straight offseasons, he has fought to keep at least one of Michael Irvin, Shannon Sharpe and Ryan Clark. ESPN let each of them go.

It was also McAfee, not Smith, whom ESPN tapped to host a live alternative broadcast from Game 3 of the NBA Finals at Madison Square Garden in June.

More importantly, McAfee embodies ESPN's newfound direction. Smith does not.

Stephen A. represented the ethos of an era built around hot takes and manufactured conflict. During a company town hall earlier this month, ESPN EVP Mike Foss instructed the company's talent to move beyond "embrace debate" and instead "embrace authenticity."

Translation: Be more like McAfee and less like Smith.

McAfee's appeal is rooted in an entirely different philosophy of sports programming. His show is overwhelmingly celebratory. He and his cast of producers and friendly guests spend less time scolding athletes and more time promoting the games, personalities and absurdities that define the interest in American sports.

"The Pat McAfee Show" leans into the irrational excitement, anxiety, tribalism and anticipation of fandom. Sports fans are the target demographic.

That formula may sound obvious. At ESPN, it qualifies as something of a breakthrough.

For too long, the network programmed toward a niche audience of viewers who were "awakened" to the supposed social injustices lurking beneath American sports. ESPN routinely filtered athletic rivalries through racial politics, whether Caitlin Clark vs. Angel Reese or Josh Allen vs. Lamar Jackson.

Whatever financial rewards Smith received for thriving during that iteration of ESPN, the era damaged the network's reputation and shrank its broader appeal.

At this point, Smith resembles a musical act whose prime has passed, but whose record label keeps extended for one large contract too many.

By contrast, ESPN is investing in McAfee because the network failed to build someone like him.

That's an important distinction. McAfee did not need ESPN to make him a star. He arrived as one and forced ESPN to make room for him.

CLICK HERE FOR MORE OUTKICK SPORTS COVERAGE

Last week, ESPN college football contributor Josh Pate spoke to OutKick about McAfee's impact on sports media and why everyone else is now playing catch-up.

"Pat McAfee, to me, when you mention that name, you have to mention that name, and then you have to stop," Pate told OutKick. "That's the end of any sentence that he's in."

Pate compared McAfee's impact on sports media to Stone Cold Steve Austin's impact on professional wrestling during the Attitude Era.

"And I remember, you know, since that Attitude Era, late '90s, when I would have been a kid growing up, since that era, there's been this whole industry that's scaled and blown up about retrospectively looking back at that era," Pate said.

"One of the concepts that always stood out to me and slapped me in the face, because I can relate to it, I can apply it to my professional life, is when people talk about the impact Steve Austin had on the industry of pro wrestling, they don't talk about him as just, no doubt, like, there have been big stars before. There have been guys who made a lot of money."

ESPN will try to build on McAfee's momentum this fall with the debut of "Bussin' with Pate" feaurting Pate, Will Compton and Taylor Lewan, airing Fridays from college football campuses.

Like McAfee, Pate and the co-hosts of "Bussin' with the Boys" built large, valuable audiences independently of traditional network media. They now command audiences, particularly in coveted demographics, that legacy networks have struggled to capture.

Hence the partnerships.

For all of ESPN's blunders, executives Mike Foss and Burke Magnus have established a coherent vision for what comes next. The new regime wants less virtue signaling, racial fixation and compulsory culture warring.

Unlike the previous regime, that vision follows viewer demand, both on linear television and across digital media. ESPN ceded ground to brands like Barstool, OutKick and The Ringer while previous executives tried to dictate what sports fans ought to care about.

The audience noticed. So did the competition.

That is not to say the McAfee-led era of ESPN won't have detractors. It already does.

But notice who is complaining. It's not sports fans raging on Threads. It's the sports media establishment. Among those most irritated by McAfee's expanded presence on Monday Night Football are Dan Le Batard and reporters from Sports Illustrated, Yahoo, and CBS.

That cohort disapproves of ESPN pivoting away from identity politics and back toward fandom. McAfee's friendly association with President Trump, despite not being political in nature, has added to the consternation among the media's self-appointed hall monitors.

Still, the outrage shouldn't phase ESPN decision-makers.

The disconnect between sports journalists and sports fans is profound. Commentators like Le Batard and Jemele Hill worry that ESPN will prioritize popularity more and skin color less. For viewers, that's step forward.

Pat McAfee's ascension represents a transfer of cultural influence inside the most powerful brand in sports media. The fans and viewers have taken back control.

They, not the executives, made McAfee the face of ESPN.

Read full story at source