Joe Cool

A scammer has your name, phone number and address. What can they actually do?

· Fox News

If you've ever wondered how much damage a scammer could really do with your name, phone number and home address, the answer is probably more than you'd expect.

Visit cat-cross.com for more information.

Those three details are generally not enough by themselves to empty your bank account, take out a major loan or completely steal your identity. However, they can give a scammer a believable starting point. From there, the goal may be to trick you into revealing the more sensitive information they still need.

That is what makes seemingly basic personal information so useful to criminals. Here's what a scammer can actually do with those details, the warning signs to watch for and the steps you can take to make yourself a harder target.

Join us for a free CyberGuy LIVE class.

Kurt "CyberGuy" Knutsson shares practical ways to stay safer, smarter and more confident with technology. Explore classes on stopping spam, phone security, financial protection and using AI to get better health care . Each class is free, easy to follow and comes with a free printable checklist .

See the classes and register at CyberGuyLive.com

THE SECRET LIST THAT TELLS SCAMMERS YOU'RE AN EASY TARGET

Your name, phone number and address may already appear in public records, old directories, property records or data broker databases. As a result, people sometimes assume there is little risk if a stranger already knows them. The problem starts when those details are combined.

A scammer may add information from a data breach, social media account, people-search site or earlier phishing attempt. Suddenly, the person contacting you may know where you live, your phone number, the names of relatives or other details that make a fake story sound legitimate.

That is why a scam call can feel so convincing even when nobody has actually hacked your phone or bank account. Data brokers can also collect information such as current and previous addresses, phone numbers, approximate age and possible relatives. A scammer may use those details to learn more about you before making contact.

Here are some of the most common ways that information could be used.

A scammer who knows your name and address can pretend to represent your bank, utility company, delivery service or government agency. For example, hearing someone read your correct home address may make the call seem legitimate. However, knowing personal information does not prove that the caller is really from the company they claim to represent.

Once someone has your address, they can send fraudulent invoices, fake prize notices, counterfeit checks or other deceptive mail directly to you. Because the material arrives at your real address and may include your full name, it can look more credible than a random email or text.

Your phone number can also become part of a SIM-swap or account-takeover attempt. A phone number and address alone usually will not be enough to take control of your wireless account. Still, a criminal may combine those details with passwords, PINs or other information stolen elsewhere. If they successfully move your number to another SIM or device, they may then receive calls and text messages intended for you, including some verification codes.

This is where the risk can grow quickly. Perhaps one database exposes your phone number and address while another contains an old password or Social Security number. Criminals can combine pieces from multiple sources to create a much more complete profile. That information may then be used for identity theft, account takeovers or additional phishing attempts.

Personal details can also strengthen family-emergency scams. A criminal may know your relative's name, where you live or other information that helps support a fake story. With AI-generated voices making impersonation scams increasingly believable, personal details can make an already emotional call even harder to judge.

Some services still rely on personal details or knowledge-based questions during account recovery. A scammer may try information such as your address, phone number or other details to see whether they can get further into a password-reset or identity-verification process. They may still need additional information. However, every correct answer can move them one step closer.

Knowing your name, phone number and address does not automatically give someone access to your bank account. Those details alone are also generally insufficient for opening major financial accounts or taking out loans because financial institutions typically require additional identity verification.

However, I would not treat that as a guarantee. The bigger concern is that a scammer can use the information they already have to convince you to provide what they are missing, such as a password, verification code, Social Security number, bank account information or credit card number. In other words, your basic information may be the beginning of the attack rather than the end.

HACKER CLAIMS 7.49M CUSTOMER RECORDS STOLEN FROM AMERICAN UTILITY COMPANY

Suppose your phone rings and the caller immediately knows your full name and home address. Then they tell you there is suspicious activity on one of your accounts. That specificity can cause you to listen a little longer. Next, they may ask you to verify a code that just arrived by text, confirm an account number or transfer money to supposedly protect it. This is where I want you to be especially careful. A caller knowing something about you is not proof that the caller knows you. Personal information should never replace independent verification.

Watch for these warning signs:

One unusual call does not necessarily mean someone has stolen your identity. Still, several warning signs appearing together deserve attention.

A few precautions can make it much harder for someone to turn basic information into a successful scam.

Search your name, phone number and address and see what comes up. You may find people-search sites and data brokers displaying information you would rather keep private. Where possible, submit opt-out requests to have those listings removed.

Ask your wireless carrier what protections it offers against SIM swaps and unauthorized number transfers. Set a strong account PIN or password and enable any available port-out or number-transfer protection.

If an unexpected caller knows your address, bank name or another personal detail, do not assume that means the call is real. Hang up and contact the company directly using a phone number or app you already trust.

Turn on two-factor authentication (2FA) for important accounts. When possible, I prefer an authenticator app, passkey or physical security key over text-message verification for especially sensitive accounts. That reduces the damage a successful SIM swap could cause.

Choose a private family verification word or phrase that family members can use if someone calls claiming there is an emergency. Do not post it online or use something a stranger could easily guess.

Avoid confirming or correcting personal details during an unexpected call. If someone says, "You're still at 123 Main Street, correct?" you do not need to tell them your new address. End the call and verify the request independently.

Review bank and credit card activity for transactions you do not recognize. You should also check your credit reports for unfamiliar accounts or inquiries. If you are concerned about identity theft, a credit freeze can make it harder for someone to open new credit accounts in your name. Credit freezes are free and can be placed with Equifax, Experian and TransUnion.

Personal information tends to accumulate online over time. One breach may expose an email address while another exposes an old password. Meanwhile, data brokers may already have your address, phone number and information about your relatives.

An identity theft protection service can help you watch for signs that some of this information is being misused. Depending on the service and plan, that may include identity monitoring, credit monitoring, financial account alerts, data broker removal and help recovering from identity theft.

Identity and financial monitoring: Some services can alert you to certain suspicious activity involving your identity, credit or financial accounts.

Data broker removal: Some plans include tools that can help remove your personal information from supported data broker and people-search sites.

Scam support: Certain services offer access to specialists who can help you evaluate suspicious messages, calls or websites.

Identity restoration: If identity theft occurs, some providers offer restoration specialists who can help guide you through the recovery process.

Loss coverage: Depending on the provider and plan, you may also get insurance or reimbursement for certain eligible identity theft expenses or losses. Coverage limits, exclusions and availability vary, so read the terms carefully.

No identity theft service can prevent scams or guarantee that your personal information will never circulate online. However, monitoring and alerts may help you spot suspicious activity sooner.

Even with strong security habits, identity theft can still happen. Your Social Security number, financial information or other personal data may already be exposed without you realizing it. If you are concerned, consider using an identity theft protection service as an added layer of monitoring and recovery support. See my tips and best picks on Best Identity Theft Protection at Cyberguy.com

It is also worth checking whether your email address or other personal information has appeared in a known data breach. Free breach-checking tools can help you identify exposed accounts so you can change affected passwords, turn on two-factor authentication (2FA) and take other steps to lock them down.

If you notice suspicious activity, act quickly. The first priority is to stop any potential damage and determine whether someone has gained access to your accounts.

Most importantly, do not let someone pressure you into making a quick decision. Scammers rely on urgency to keep you from checking whether their story is real.

SCAMMERS ARE COMING FOR YOUR MONEY. HERE’S THE ONE THING YOU MUST NEVER DO

Your name, phone number and address may not seem like highly sensitive information, especially when some of it can already be found online. Still, those details can give a scammer enough material to build a much more believable story. I would pay less attention to how much a caller knows about you and more attention to what they want you to do next. If they ask for money, a password, a verification code or another sensitive detail, end the conversation and verify the request yourself. You probably cannot erase every trace of your personal information from the internet. However, you can reduce what is exposed, lock down important accounts and make sure a stranger cannot use a few correct details to earn your trust.

How would you react if a caller knew your full name, phone number and home address? Would those details make you trust the call, or would they make you more suspicious? Let us know by writing to us at Cyberguy.com

Sign up for my FREE CyberGuy Newsletter

Copyright 2026 CyberGuy.com. All rights reserved.

Read full story at source

ইউক্রেনে এখন নতুন প্রেসিডেন্ট বেছে নেওয়ার সময় এসেছে: ট্রাম্প

· Prothom Alo

যুক্তরাষ্ট্রের প্রেসিডেন্ট ডোনাল্ড ট্রাম্প বলেছেন, ইউক্রেনে এখন নতুন প্রেসিডেন্ট বেছে নেওয়ার সময় এসেছে বলে তিনি মনে করছেন।

রাশিয়ার সঙ্গে সম্প্রতি ডিজেল চুক্তি করেছে ট্রাম্প প্রশাসন। এ ঘটনার কড়া সমালোচনা করেছিলেন ইউক্রেনের প্রেসিডেন্ট ভলোদিমির জেলেনস্কি। এর জবাবে ট্রাম্প এমন মন্তব্য করলেন।

Visit biznow.biz for more information.

জেলেনস্কি সতর্ক করে বলেছেন, লাখ লাখ টন রুশ ডিজেল যুক্তরাষ্ট্রে আনার নতুন চুক্তিটি মস্কোকে তাঁর দেশের বিরুদ্ধে যুদ্ধ চালিয়ে যাওয়ার জন্য অর্থ জোগাবে। তিনি একে রুশ প্রেসিডেন্ট ভ্লাদিমির পুতিনের জন্য একটি ‘উপহার’ হিসেবেও উল্লেখ করেন।

এ বক্তব্যের প্রতিক্রিয়ায় গতকাল শনিবার হোয়াইট হাউসের বাইরে সাংবাদিকদের ট্রাম্প বলেন, রাশিয়ার তেল শোধনাগারগুলোয় হামলার অনুমোদন অব্যাহত রেখে জেলেনস্কি ‘বিশ্বের জন্য সমস্যা সৃষ্টি করতে’ চাইছেন। এটা অবিলম্বে বন্ধ করা উচিত।

ট্রাম্প পরামর্শ দেন, ইউক্রেনের এমন একজন নতুন নেতা বেছে নেওয়া উচিত, যিনি একটি চুক্তিতে পৌঁছাতে পারবেন।

২০২২ সালের ফেব্রুয়ারিতে ইউক্রেনে সর্বাত্মক যুদ্ধ শুরু করে রাশিয়া। তখন থেকে ইউক্রেনে সামরিক আইন চলছে। দেশটির নিয়ম অনুযায়ী, এ আইন বলবৎ থাকায় নির্বাচন স্থগিত হয়ে গেছে। ক্ষমতায় রয়ে গেছেন জেলেনস্কি।

ইরানের বিরুদ্ধে যুক্তরাষ্ট্র ও ইসরায়েলের যুদ্ধের জেরে বিশ্ববাজারে ডিজেলসহ সব জ্বালানি পণ্যের সরবরাহ মারাত্মকভাবে ব্যাহত হচ্ছে। বিশেষ করে হরমুজ প্রণালিতে জাহাজ চলাচল বন্ধ হয়ে যাওয়ায় পরিস্থিতি জটিল হয়েছে। এ জলপথ দিয়ে বিশ্বের জ্বালানি সরবরাহের এক–পঞ্চমাংশ পরিবহন করা হতো।

জ্বালানি পণ্যের অন্যতম প্রধান উৎপাদক দেশ রাশিয়া। ইউক্রেন ও রাশিয়া সম্প্রতি একে অপরের জ্বালানি অবকাঠামো ও পরিবহনব্যবস্থায় হামলা জোরদার করেছে। এর কারণে জ্বালানি বাজারের ওপর বাড়তি চাপ সৃষ্টি হয়েছে।

এ প্রসঙ্গে ট্রাম্প আরও বলেন, ‘আমরা বলেছিলাম, মস্কোর বিরুদ্ধে আপনারা যা খুশি করতে পারেন, কিন্তু তেল শোধনাগারগুলোয় আক্রমণ করবেন না। কারণ, এতে বিশ্বজুড়ে সমস্যা দেখা দেবে।’

জেলেনস্কির সমালোচনা করে ট্রাম্প বলেন, ‘তিনি (জেলেনস্কি) বেশ কিছু চুক্তি করতে পারতেন। কিন্তু অজানা কারণে সেটা করেন না।’

যুদ্ধে নতুন কৌশল: ইউক্রেনের পরিবহনব্যবস্থায় হামলা বাড়াচ্ছে রাশিয়া

এর আগে গত শুক্রবার ট্রাম্প জানান, রাশিয়ার ডিজেল রপ্তানির ওপর নিষেধাজ্ঞা আগামী ৭ এপ্রিল পর্যন্ত স্থগিত রাখার বিষয়ে মস্কোর সঙ্গে একটি সমঝোতা হয়েছে।

এর প্রতিক্রিয়ায় জেলেনস্কি বলেন, যুক্তরাষ্ট্রের সঙ্গে ডিজেল চুক্তির ফলে মস্কো নতুন তহবিল সংগ্রহ করতে পারবে। সেই সঙ্গে যুদ্ধ চালিয়ে যাওয়ার জন্য নতুন সামরিক সরঞ্জাম জোগাড় করতে পারবে।

রাশিয়া ৩ লাখ টন ডিজেল বিশ্ববাজারে ছাড়ছে

Read full story at source

This Hispanic Heritage Month, our stallout in the Fortune 500 gives me pause 

· Fortune

For 20 years, I have been taking the same phone call. A fellow chief executive calls me: more often than not a Latina, and more often than not the first one her organization has ever hired.

Visit moryak.biz for more information.

She was hired to change the place. Everyone she met during the interview process was on board with the plan. Then, somewhere around month nine, something shifts. She realizes the assignment she was handed is one the organization was never built to support.

She usually thinks that is a verdict on her competence. It is not. It is a gap in what was built around her.

When we hire someone to transform an organization, we tend to hand her the role that was designed for the person who came before: the same budget, the same board meeting cadence, the same outline for a standing agenda. We keep all of it in place and ask her to do something the old design was never built to do. Then, when the change hits a roadblock, we look at the leader.

Right now, Hispanic Heritage Month is filling programs across the country with firsts. I want to know what got built around them, because in nine months some of them will be calling me.

Here is the number that should give us all pause. A record 55 women are running Fortune 500 companies this year, 11% of the list and the highest share in its 72-year history. Not one of them is a Latina. When Priscilla Almodóvar left Fannie Mae last October, the Fortune 500 lost the only Latina chief executive it had.

Now, the Latina executives who call me want the job more than anyone else in the running. In Lean In’s study of Latinas in corporate America, 87% said they want to be promoted, against 81% of women overall, and 44% said advancement had become more important to them over the previous two years, against 36% of women overall. My phone is not going to get quieter, either. Of the 186 chief executive departures Challenger, Gray & Christmas counted in August, government and nonprofit organizations accounted for 62, more than any other sector.

The shortfall in support begins with managers, often the first advocate anyone has in their career. Thirty-nine percent of Latinas say their manager shows interest in their career advancement, against 46% of white women, and 47% say their manager makes sure they get credit for their work, against 53%.

The loss is felt at the very first rung of the corporate ladder. For every 100 men promoted from entry level to manager, 74 Latinas are promoted. By the C-suite, Latinas are 1% of executives, down from just under 5% at entry level — a drop of 78% across a career, the largest of any group in the study.

Thirty years ago, John Kotter spent a decade watching more than a hundred companies try to remake themselves, and he found that most of those efforts fell short. He catalogued eight reasons why. Some of them belong to the leader. Others describe conditions no chief executive can build alone: a coalition of senior people genuinely committed to the change, reporting lines and compensation systems that stop rewarding the old way of working, and a board close enough to the transformation to understand what it requires.

We are also not measuring the thing we say we want. In Lean In and McKinsey’s 2024 Women in the Workplace study, 78% of managers said more is expected of them than a few years ago, most often around employee well-being, career development and inclusion. Only 37% of companies evaluate their managers on whether they develop anyone. Expectations went up and accountability never followed.

I leave every event with 20 business cards from women asking me to be their mentor. Nobody counts that as infrastructure, but it is what fills in when the institution does not.

No board ever sets out to sabotage its own leader. Directors are usually volunteers giving hours to an organization they believe in. Their governance training covers how to hire an executive and how to evaluate one, and then it stops.

I have been a chief executive five times, and in the best of those transitions, much of the board’s work began before I walked through the door. The boards that got it right did three things.

They built a structure for the first year before anyone needed it. In one of those roles, the chair assembled a formal transition committee that met with me throughout my first six months. It arrived with a detailed plan to introduce me to the people who mattered most to the organization and to hand over the donor relationships, so I was never building every connection from scratch.

They made the mandate for change their own, and said so out loud. More than once, a board told its stakeholders early and plainly that I had been hired to redesign the business and that the directors stood behind the changes. One chair went further and advocated for me in rooms I was not in, which mattered most in the months when the work got hard. None of them left me to carry the case for change alone.

They treated the top of the organization as a partnership. In one transition, my predecessor stepped back from the day-to-day and made himself available for advice whenever I asked. We agreed at the start that the organization’s success would come before either of our egos, and I can still call him on any issue. One chair put the principle to me simply: a great board chair is a partner, not a hammer.

Every one of those steps fit inside the budget the organization already had. What made them possible was a board that treated my first year as a design problem instead of a probation period.

For 20 years, the question on those calls has been whether the leader was strong enough. The better question, and the one I want us to ask, is what we built around her.

When I got through that door, I took off my chancla and wedged it in the frame. My job was to keep it open for everybody else.

The opinions expressed in Fortune.com commentary pieces are solely the views of their authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions and beliefs of Fortune.

This story was originally featured on Fortune.com

Read full story at source