Joe Cool

AI giants learn what everyone else on the modern internet already knows

· Business Insider

Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei

Visit salonsustainability.club for more information.

Here's some delicious AI irony for you.

For years, tech giants have argued that if information is available on the internet, it can be used for AI model development and outputs. They call it fair use. Content owners have tried to prevent this, with no success.

Now Anthropic, OpenAI, and Google are discovering what the rest of the internet has already learned through painful experience: once you put something online, people will find ways to use it in ways you don't like and can't stop.

The latest flashpoint is something called "distillation," using the outputs of one AI model to improve another. Anthropic says competitors are harvesting its outputs at scale, turning billions of dollars of research into a shortcut for rivals. OpenAI and Google have made similar warnings recently.

The fear is obvious. Why spend billions building the best AI models if someone else can recreate much of this intelligence for a fraction of the cost?

That's a legitimate business concern. But here's the awkward part.

Symmetry

From 30,000 feet, distillation looks an awful lot like what AI companies have been doing to the rest of the internet. Scrape web content for free and without permission. Turn it into a product you sell. Argue it's fair use. Hope the lawyers sort out the details later.

Anthropic says rivals are extracting intelligence from its top models. Website owners have spent the past three years saying Anthropic extracted intelligence from them. Both sides argue this is against their terms of service. The symmetry is hard to ignore.

And despite pitching itself as the most ethical AI company, Anthropic is by far the worst actor here. Its data-sucking bots crawl webpages thousands of times for every one referral the company sends back to the web.

Bots on both sides

Anthropic, OpenAI, and especially Google, frame this as a cybersecurity issue, pointing to swarms of bots "attacking" their models to extract intelligence. But, they've been doing the same to many websites, bombarding them with so much bot crawling activity that site owners have seen their operating costs skyrocket. Not only are some websites having their content used without permission, they are paying more for the privilege.

AI researchers say distillation is different from web scraping. But the AI industry can't even decide whether distillation is OK or not, or where to draw the line.

There's the original, benign form of distillation, where labs use outputs from their own models to create different, often smaller, models. Then, there's what Anthropic calls "distillation attacks," where rivals use other people's AI outputs to develop or improve their own offerings.

Even here, though, the lines blur, with some AI researchers now worrying that Anthropic's aggressive stance will hurt all types of distillation. Open-source AI expert Nathan Lambert calls this "distillation panic."

So, let me wrap this up for you, from the AI giants' perspective: They can extract intelligence from the web for free and without permission. That's different from distillation, which is OK. Oh, but not when distillation involves using their content in ways they don't like.

"A cat-and-mouse game"

This contorted argument is being demolished by the brutal realities of the modern internet. Anthropic has spent months tightening access to its top models to stop competitors from learning too much. Those efforts have either backfired, or they're just spurring more elaborate workarounds.

Once information goes online, clever people will figure out how to collect it, remix it, and profit from it. That's true for blogs, photos, software code, videos, and yes, AI giants' precious model outputs.

"It's always a kind of a cat-and-mouse game," Zilan Qian, a researcher at the Oxford China Policy Lab, told Business Insider. As long as AI model outputs are out in the world, "people will probably find a way to get access to it."

Indeed, distilling another company's AI model may even be fair use. These legal arguments can cut both ways.

Welcome to the new internet, Anthropic, OpenAI, and Google. Get used to it.

Sign up for BI's Tech Memo newsletter here. Reach out to me via email at [email protected].

Read the original article on Business Insider

Read full story at source

“Can Put Up Prime Magic Johnson Numbers”: Knicks Superfan Makes Bold LeBron James Claim

· Yahoo Sports

As whispers of LeBron James nearing a deal continue to swirl, one celebrity NBA fan has jumped into the debate over his fit on any roster. The rap mogul’s deepest basketball allegiances reside firmly in the Big Apple, as one of the most visible and vocal New York Knicks superfans, the Queens native is still on an emotional rollercoaster as Jalen Brunson ended the Knicks’ 53-year championship drought.

Visit tr-sport.bond for more information.

Known primarily for his unwavering loyalty to New York teams, the Knicks chief among them, Ja Rule took his passion for basketball to SiriusXM NBA Radio, where he ignited social media with an astonishing projection about LeBron’s statistical ceiling. It was, as these collisions of hip-hop and basketball culture tend to be, an explosive take. The viral debate unfolded during Justin Termine and Eddie A. Johnson’s Summer League show, where the multi-platinum musician paused to evaluate the longevity of the league’s all-time leading scorer.

“LeBron James is in year, was it 21?” Ja Rule questioned the broadcasting duo.

“23,” the hosts quickly corrected, but left out the part that James is fully prepared to return for a historic 24th season.

Without missing a beat, the rapper doubled down on his unprecedented expectation for the 41-year-old forward.

“At 41, he can put up prime Magic Johnson numbers,” Ja proclaimed. “Let me say that again. At 41, LeBron James can put up prime Magic Johnson numbers as a facilitator.”

Those “prime Magic Johnson numbers” are no casual benchmark: during his Showtime Lakers peak, Magic routinely averaged double-digit assists, topping out at 989 assists in the 1990-91 season alone. Suggesting that a player who just finished his 23rd NBA season can mirror the production of one of the greatest point guards in basketball history is an incredibly massive declaration.

It can’t be discounted that Magic ended his NBA career early in 1991, at the age of 36, after revealing his HIV diagnosis, and he was able to return to the court multiple times to prove he had a few seasons left in him.

His comments come when some claim an aging LeBron held the Lakers back. James has transitioned heavily into a primary floor general role later in his career, even capturing an NBA assist title after averaging 10.9 assists in the 2019-2020 season on the way to his fourth chip.

After Bron has adjusted his game to his age, Ja Rule feels he’s matching Magic’s pure distribution efficiency at age 41 and defying every established law of athletic regression.

Given that Ja Rule’s loyalties aren’t extensively with King James, it’s a tall comparison.

From calling himself the LeBron James of rap music to comparing Drake’s feuds to Bronny fighting for validation in the NBA, Ja Rule is full of those comparisons.

That undying loyalty culminated in him dropping a follow-up to his New York anthem. He dropped a new rap tribute celebrating the title run on social media. Although fans preferred his original 2004 track, his love for the Knicks was obvious.

And now he might potentially see one of the Knicks’ biggest rivals return to the East. If rumors are to be believed, LeBron James may havefinalized a deal with the Cleveland Cavaliers for a third stint.

Despite the critical divide over his latest musical release, the hip-hop pioneer’s status as a superfan in basketball culture remains entirely undisputed. He’s one of those excited for LeBron James’ return for a 24th season, and he’s ensuring others share his hype, too.

Trending Articles

The post “Can Put Up Prime Magic Johnson Numbers”: Knicks Superfan Makes Bold LeBron James Claim appeared first on EssentiallySports. Add EssentiallySports as a Preferred Source by clicking here.

Read full story at source

Who wants their child to be a millionaire? Trump has given you that chance

· Fox News

Trump Accounts officially launched on July 4, and they could become one of the most important wealth-building tools created for American families in a generation.

For parents, grandparents, and guardians who worry that their children will inherit a future of high housing costs, mounting debt, and fewer opportunities, Trump Accounts offer something refreshingly practical: a way to begin building wealth for children from the very start of life.

Visit newsbetting.cv for more information.

Trump Accounts are new tax-advantaged investment accounts for children in the United States. They are designed for long-term savings, especially retirement, rather than short-term spending. Eligible children born from 2025 through 2028 can receive a one-time $1,000 contribution from the U.S. Treasury Department after an account is opened. Families can then contribute up to $5,000 per year, with the money invested in U.S. stock funds and allowed to grow tax-deferred.

DEMOCRATIC MARYLAND GOV WES MOORE PRAISES TRUMP ACCOUNTS AS ‘SMART POLICY’

Importantly, Trump Accounts are not limited to parents alone. Employers can contribute up to $2,500 per worker each year, which counts toward the $5,000 annual limit. Qualifying charities, philanthropists, and state and local governments can also make contributions under specified circumstances, and those contributions do not count toward the $5,000 limit.

If properly and widely used, Trump Accounts could become a national wealth-building platform supported by parents, grandparents, businesses, charities, and local communities.

Trump Accounts are available for children aged 18 or younger. Parents, legal guardians, grandparents, adult siblings, and other authorized individuals can open an account for a child, provided the child is a U.S. citizen with a work-authorized Social Security number. The funds generally cannot be withdrawn before age 18. At that point, the account converts into a traditional Individual Retirement Account (IRA), subject to the usual IRA rules.

'THE VIEW' CO-HOST SUNNY HOSTIN PRAISES TRUMP FOR 'GOOD POLICIES' ON FERTILITY CARE AND CHILD SAVINGS ACCOUNTS

The real power of Trump Accounts is time. Suppose a family contributes the maximum $5,000 per year for 18 years and earns an average annual return of 7 percent, which is well within historical norms. Using a conservative assumption that each contribution is made at the end of the year, the account would grow to about $170,000 by the time the child reaches adulthood. If contributions are made earlier in each year, the total would be even higher.

For many families, that alone would be life-changing. A young adult with roughly $170,000 in long-term retirement savings begins adulthood in a radically different position from someone starting from zero, especially since some of the funds can be used without paying a penalty to pay for college or for a down payment on a home.

However, the most powerful benefit comes later. Imagine the same child receives $5,000 per year from birth through age 18. Then, after becoming an adult, that child contributes just $1,000 per year on average until age 65, an extremely conservative contribution amount. Assuming the same 7 percent average annual return, that account would grow to more than $4 million by retirement.

That is the magic of compound growth. If you start early, save consistently, and allow time to do what time does best, almost any child could become a millionaire.

Of course, not every family can put away $5,000 every year. Many families will not come close. But if employers, nonprofits, philanthropists, churches, local charities, and state governments choose to help children fund these accounts, the benefits could extend to far more families than they otherwise would.

That is one of the most promising features of the program. It creates a structure for private generosity and community investment. Instead of relying solely on another government bureaucracy, Trump Accounts make it easier for families and civil society to work together to help children build assets over time.

Of course, investment returns are never guaranteed. Markets can be volatile. Families should understand the risks before putting money into any investment account. But over long periods, broad exposure to American businesses has historically been one of the most reliable ways for ordinary people to build wealth.

CLICK HERE FOR MORE FOX NEWS OPINION

For decades, policymakers have talked endlessly about expanding government programs to help reduce wealth inequality and improve opportunities for the middle class. Many of these proposed solutions have involved bigger bureaucracies, more complicated programs, and more dependency on government. Trump Accounts offer something much better, because they help families build significant wealth and ownership for their children.

Ownership changes how people see the world. A child with a growing investment account is connected to the success of American companies, workers, entrepreneurs, and innovators. Instead of watching wealth creation from the sidelines, that child participates in it. And instead of thinking capitalism is only for the wealthy, it helps children see that everyone can benefit from free markets.

The launch of Trump Accounts gives parents, grandparents, employers and charities a rare opportunity. With early contributions, steady saving, and patience, they can help turn a modest annual investment into life-changing wealth.

For millions of American children, that could mean more than another account. It could mean a better future.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM JUSTIN HASKINS

Read full story at source